The Drifter's Highway

There is a moment, captured in the dry language of a police report, that seems almost impossible to believe. A man is running through a parking lot in Camas, Washington, on a cold night in November 1989, and he is chasing a child. Not the other way around. The child got away. And that small, desperate fact — a little boy who ran fast enough, who screamed loud enough — would unravel one of the darkest chapters in the history of the Pacific Northwest.

But before we get to the parking lot, we have to go back to the park.

---

Vancouver, Washington sits just across the Columbia River from Portland, Oregon, close enough that the two cities share a kind of geographic intimacy, their suburbs bleeding into one another through stretches of quiet residential streets, strip malls, and green public spaces. David Douglas Park is one of those spaces — a neighborhood park, the kind parents consider safe because it is familiar, because other families use it, because it is close to home. In the late summer and fall of 1989, brothers William Neer, age eleven, and Cole Neer, age ten, rode their bikes there often. They were Clark County boys, unremarkable in the best possible sense: they liked the outdoors, they looked out for each other the way brothers do, they were known in their neighborhood as good kids who came home when they were supposed to.

On September 4th, 1989, Labor Day, they rode their bikes into David Douglas Park and did not come home.

A family member found them that evening, both boys hidden in the brush, both having suffered stab wounds. Cole was already gone. William was still alive when help arrived, but he died before the day was out. They had been murdered. The community that gathered around that grief was stunned — not just by the violence of it, but by the apparent randomness. Investigators with the Clark County Sheriff's Office and the Vancouver Police Department had a crime scene, two victims, and almost nothing else. Whoever had done this had left behind no useful witnesses, no clear physical evidence that pointed to a name or a face. The case went cold in the way that the worst cases do: not forgotten, but frozen.

Then, six weeks later, the horror reached across the river.

---

Lee Joseph Iseli was six years old. He had brown hair and a gap-toothed smile and a way of looking at the camera in photographs that his family would later describe, simply, as full of life. He lived in Portland with his family, the kind of small child for whom the world was still mostly wonder — playgrounds and cartoons and the uncomplicated comfort of people who loved him. On October 29th, 1989, Lee was at Richmond Elementary School's playground in northeast Portland with an older brother. At some point, in the way that can happen in a moment of ordinary inattention, Lee wandered, or was led, away. His brother looked up and he was gone.

The search that followed consumed Portland. Lee's face was on the news. His parents, his family, a neighborhood — everyone was looking. What no one knew yet was that Lee had already been taken across state lines, into Washington, by a man who had been watching playgrounds with deliberate, predatory intent. Prosecutors would later argue, drawing on the man's own words, that Lee had been abducted, driven to an apartment in Vancouver, Washington, subjected to horrific abuse, and murdered. His small body was found the following morning, October 30th, in a wooded area in Vancouver. He was still wearing his school clothes.

The connection between the Neer brothers' murders and the killing of Lee Iseli was not immediately apparent to investigators — different jurisdictions, different methods, different victims. But law enforcement on both sides of the Columbia River was now looking for someone capable of extraordinary violence against children, someone who appeared to move freely through public spaces, who selected victims of opportunity, who left almost nothing behind.

What they did not yet know was that this person had been doing this, in one form or another, for a very long time.

---

Westley Allan Dodd was thirty years old in the fall of 1989. He had grown up in the Pacific Northwest and had, by his own later account, begun molesting children as a teenager — beginning, chillingly, with younger cousins, progressing through a pattern of offenses that had brought him into contact with the juvenile justice system and, eventually, the adult criminal system, though never in ways that stopped him for long or put him away permanently. He had served time. He had been released. He had moved from place to place, working ordinary jobs, living in ordinary apartments, maintaining the unremarkable surface of a man who blended into the background of any neighborhood. He had also, by his own later admission, been keeping a diary — detailed, meticulous, deeply disturbing — documenting his crimes and his intentions.

In the weeks between the Neer murders and the abduction of Lee Iseli, Dodd had continued to move through the region, working at a job in Vancouver, attending to the routines of daily life, and planning. What investigators would eventually piece together, through Dodd's own confessions and that diary, was a picture of methodical, escalating predation — a man who had spent years refining his approach and who, by the autumn of 1989, had crossed into murder.

The break, when it came, arrived not from forensic science or a witness coming forward from the September crime scene. It arrived because a child ran.

---

On November 13th, 1989, Dodd went to the New Liberty Theater in Camas, Washington. He had, according to his later confession and court records, gone there intending to abduct a child. He found a six-year-old boy in the theater, attempted to take him, and the boy screamed and pulled away. Dodd fled. But in the commotion, he was seen. A theater employee and others in the area caught enough of a look to raise an alarm, and Dodd was apprehended in the parking lot before he could get away. He was taken into custody by Camas police on the spot.

There is something worth pausing on here — the sheer ordinariness of the arrest. No dramatic standoff, no chase across state lines. A man caught in a parking lot. The child who got away was unharmed. And the man in custody initially appeared to be facing a relatively contained charge: attempted kidnapping. He gave his name. He was booked. And then investigators began to look more closely.

What they found, when they searched Dodd's person and his vehicle, was the beginning of a trail that led straight to two open homicide investigations. Among the items recovered were things that connected him — physically and documentarily — to Lee Iseli's murder. Dodd was transferred to Portland authorities, and there, in custody, he did something that detectives rarely encounter so directly: he talked. He confessed, in detail, to the murder of Lee Iseli. And then, in subsequent interviews, he confessed to the murders of William and Cole Neer.

He described what he had done with a specificity that investigators found deeply corroborating — details about the park, about the boys, about Lee Iseli, that had never been released publicly. He turned over his diary, which prosecutors would describe in court as a documented record of his crimes and intentions, written in his own hand. He led investigators to evidence. He did not equivocate. He said he had done these things. He said he would do them again if he was released.

---

Westley Allan Dodd was charged with three counts of aggravated first-degree murder in Washington State. The case against him, by the time it reached a courtroom, was as thoroughly documented as any prosecutor could hope for: a confession freely given, a diary that served as a running record of his offenses, physical evidence, and a defendant who did not, in any meaningful sense, dispute what he had done.

The trial began in July 1990. Dodd's defense attorneys entered a plea of not guilty, as is their obligation, and raised the question of whether their client was legally sane — whether, under Washington State law, he could be held criminally responsible in the full sense. It was the only real argument available to them, and it was an argument the jury did not accept. Psychiatric experts testified on both sides. The jury deliberated and returned its verdict: guilty on all three counts of aggravated first-degree murder.

The penalty phase that followed required the jury to determine whether Dodd would be sentenced to death. Washington State law at the time allowed the death penalty for aggravated first-degree murder, and prosecutors argued that the nature of the crimes — the premeditation, the youth of the victims, the evidence of a sustained pattern of predatory violence — warranted the ultimate sanction. The jury agreed. Westley Allan Dodd was sentenced to death on all three counts.

He was thirty-one years old.

---

What happened next was, in its own way, as unusual as anything else in this case.

Dodd did not want to appeal. He fired his attorneys. He petitioned the courts himself, arguing that he should be allowed to waive his appeals and proceed to execution. His stated reasoning, offered in legal filings and in public statements that drew enormous attention at the time, was that he was dangerous, that he knew he was dangerous, and that if he were ever released from prison — through reversal, through escape, through any mechanism — he would offend again. He said the only way to guarantee that he would not hurt another child was to be put to death.

The legal system, which is generally not designed to accelerate executions, found itself in the strange position of processing a condemned man's insistence on his own death. Courts reviewed his competency — his ability to make this decision knowingly and voluntarily — and determined that he was competent, that he understood what he was doing and what he was giving up. His waiver of appeals was accepted.

Washington State, at this point, faced its own reckoning. The state had not carried out an execution since 1963. And the method of execution on the books — the method Dodd would be subject to — was hanging. There were legal challenges filed by others, not by Dodd, arguing that hanging constituted cruel and unusual punishment. Those challenges made their way through the courts and were ultimately unsuccessful. Hanging remained a legal method of execution in Washington State.

On January 5th, 1993, Westley Allan Dodd was executed by hanging at the Washington State Penitentiary in Walla Walla. It was the first legal hanging carried out in the United States since 1965. He was thirty-three years old.

He had asked that his execution be carried out this way. He had asked that it not be delayed. He had said, in the months leading up to it, that he hoped his case would serve as a warning — that there were people who could not be rehabilitated, who should not be released, and that the justice system needed to take that seriously.

It was a strange kind of final statement from a man who had caused such irreversible harm. Whether it constitutes any kind of redemption, any kind of meaningful reckoning, is not a question the law can answer. It is the kind of question that lives with the people who loved William Neer, and Cole Neer, and Lee Iseli — and that is where it belongs.

---

There are things about this case that the legal record will tell you with precision: dates, charges, verdicts, the mechanics of an execution. What the legal record cannot fully hold is the weight of what was lost.

Cole Neer was ten years old. William was eleven. They were brothers who rode bikes together on a holiday afternoon in a park they knew well, in a neighborhood where their family had reason to feel safe. They never came home. Lee Iseli was six — six years old, gap-toothed and alive, there on a school playground with his brother one moment, gone the next. Three children. Three families. Three communities on both sides of a river, left to carry something that does not get lighter with time.

In the years following Dodd's execution, advocates for child safety, including law enforcement officials who had worked the case, pointed to it repeatedly in discussions about monitoring and tracking convicted sex offenders. The passage of community notification laws — what would come to be known broadly as Megan's Law, enacted federally in 1996 — was informed in part by cases like this one, by the demonstrated reality that individuals with documented histories of child predation could move through communities undetected, unmonitored, until another child paid the price.

Dodd had a record. He had served time. He had been released, more than once. And then came the fall of 1989, and two boys in a park, and a six-year-old on a playground.

There is no clean ending to offer here. The man who did these things is gone, executed by the state, by his own insistence, nearly thirty years ago now. The case is closed in every legal sense. The evidence is archived, the transcripts preserved, the diary — that meticulous, terrible document — sealed in a court record somewhere in Washington State. Justice, such as it is, was served within the structures that exist to serve it.

But in Vancouver, and in Portland, and in the quiet places where families keep their grief, three names remain. William. Cole. Lee. Boys who should have grown up, who should have had decades ahead of them, who deserved the ordinary future that was taken from them on two mild days in the Pacific Northwest in the autumn of 1989.

That is the thing about cases like this one. The parking lot, the arrest, the confession, the trial, the verdict, the hanging — those are the story the law tells. The real story is shorter, and simpler, and it does not end. Three children went out to play. They did not come home.